IT Architecture and Cloud Consulting
We help you decide, based on data, whether your applications should run in the public cloud, in your own data center or in a hybrid setup that combines the two. We prepare the target architecture and roadmap, migrate workloads to the cloud or to a hybrid setup in a planned way and make costs traceable.
- Environments
- AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, local cloud providers, your own data center
- Direction
- Cloud migration, cloud repatriation, hybrid and multi-site
- Approach
- Options are compared on cost, risk and time
- First step
- Free initial consultation or free assessment
When do architecture and cloud decisions come up?
Architecture decisions affect cost, security and flexibility for many years. That is why we compare the options against the same criteria before a decision is made.
- Cloud costs need to be tracked more closely. Seeing which team and product each cost belongs to makes budget planning easier.
- Workloads moved to the cloud have not delivered the expected efficiency. Servers moved as is may need to be revisited with managed services and right-sizing.
- Data center hardware is approaching its refresh cycle. A comparative decision is needed between refreshing, moving to the cloud or building a hybrid setup.
- Critical systems depend on a single location. There should be a plan for how services continue when a server, region or connection goes down.
- Data residency and regulatory requirements need to be clarified. Determining which data can be stored where is a prerequisite for projects to move forward.
- Virtualization licensing terms have changed. The total cost and risk of staying on the current platform and of moving to alternatives should be compared.
What do we do in cloud and IT architecture?
Design, migration and operations planning for infrastructure and cloud architecture.
Target architecture and roadmap
A phased architecture plan that can be budgeted, starts from your business goals and documents the reasoning behind each option.
Cloud foundation (landing zone)
Account structure, identity and access, networking, security policies and cost tags; a foundation built as code before workloads arrive.
Migrating workloads to the cloud
Moving workloads from physical and virtual servers to the cloud, with an inventory, a migration strategy and a downtime plan.
Cloud repatriation
Planned migration of workloads to your own data center or to a local cloud provider, for cost, performance or regulatory reasons.
Hybrid, multi-cloud and multi-site
Designing networking, identity, backup and management as a single whole across data center, branch and cloud environments.
Cost management (FinOps)
Cost visibility by team and product, budget alerts, right-sizing of resources and regular cost reviews with your teams.
Virtualization and VMware alternatives
VMware, Hyper-V, Proxmox or OpenStack virtualization; planned migration from platforms whose licensing terms have changed.
Continuity and disaster recovery
High availability, backup strategy, downtime and data loss targets (RTO/RPO), and regular recovery drills.
Not every application needs to move.
In a cloud migration, the right strategy is chosen separately for each application. Sometimes the best decision is to leave an application where it is or to retire it.
Lift and shift
Moving the application as it is. It is fast but the gains are limited; it is often the first step.
Move with minor changes
Moving to managed services with small changes, for example moving the database to a managed service.
Re-architect
Turning the application into a cloud-native architecture. It takes the most effort and gives the most flexibility.
Replace with SaaS
Replacing an application you built in-house with an off-the-shelf SaaS product that meets the need.
Move the platform
Moving the virtualization layer as a whole to another infrastructure, without touching the applications.
Keep in place
If there is no reason to move it today, leaving the application where it is and revisiting it later.
Decommission
Shutting down applications that are no longer used; this directly reduces migration scope and cost.
Decided per application
The strategy for each application is set individually, together with its cost, risk and business value.
We measure before we decide.
Every architecture recommendation is based on data about your current state and on your business goals. We present what we recommend and why, with written reasoning.
What we weigh in architecture decisions
We compare every option against the same criteria:
- Total cost of ownership
- Security and regulatory compliance
- Scalability and performance
- Your team's ability to operate it
Inventory and analysis
We map out applications, dependencies, data flows and current costs.
Output: Inventory and dependency mapOptions and target architecture
We compare the alternatives in terms of cost, risk and time, and decide together.
Output: Target architecture documentMigration plan
We set the migration order in waves, the rollback plan and the downtime windows.
Output: Phased migration planImplementation
We build the infrastructure as code, then migrate and validate workloads in waves.
Output: Migrated and validated workloadsOptimization and handover
We tune cost and performance, embed cost tracking in your teams and hand over with documentation and training. If you wish, we continue with periodic cost reviews.
Output: Optimization report, documentationOutputs of the architecture and migration work.
Deliverables depend on the scope of work; the reasoning behind decisions and the definitions of what was built are documented and in your hands.
Architecture documentation
Target architecture, network and security design, decision records.
Cost analysis
Comparison of current and target costs, savings recommendations.
Infrastructure code
In implementation projects, versioned definitions of the new environment written in Terraform and Ansible.
Migration, rollback and exit plans
Steps, checks and a rollback path for each wave; a way to switch providers when needed.
Disaster recovery plan
Backup, recovery procedures and drill results.
Knowledge transfer
Hands-on training for your team on operating the new setup.
Technologies chosen to fit the need.
We evaluate the options against your requirements, your existing investments and your team's capacity to operate them. Where possible, we prefer open standards and portable tools.
Public cloud
- AWS
- Microsoft Azure
- Google Cloud
Local and private cloud
- Local cloud providers
- OpenStack
- VMware vSphere
- Proxmox
- Hyper-V
Networking and identity
- VPN / Direct Connect / ExpressRoute
- Entra ID (Azure AD)
- Keycloak
- Active Directory
Backup and recovery
- Veeam
- Velero
- Cloud-native backup services
Cloud and architecture work at your scale.
SMEs
Work usually starts with a hardware refresh or a first cloud decision; the aim is a simple setup with predictable costs.
Growing companies
Making cloud spending visible, organizing the account structure and connecting new locations to a common architecture.
Regulated and enterprise organizations
Building data residency, continuity and audit requirements into the architecture from the start.
Making the first meeting productive.
None of these is a prerequisite; whatever you have makes the first conversation more concrete.
What you can prepare, if available
- A breakdown of your cloud bills for the last few months, or your hardware and license costs
- An application and server inventory, and architecture diagrams if available
- Hardware and license renewal dates
- Data residency, continuity and regulatory requirements
About IT architecture and cloud
References and standards
- AWS Well-Architected (opens in a new tab)AWS architecture principles
- Azure Well-Architected Framework (opens in a new tab)Azure architecture principles
- Google Cloud Architecture Framework (opens in a new tab)Google Cloud architecture principles
- FinOps Foundation (opens in a new tab)Cloud cost management practices
- NIST SP 800-34 (opens in a new tab)IT contingency planning guide
Let's clarify your needs together.
In a free initial consultation we discuss your current situation and goals, and share our first impressions and possible next steps in the same meeting.
- A technical conversation with specialists in your area
- First impressions of your situation and possible approaches
- Where it fits, a next step: an assessment, a project proposal or consulting
- A non-disclosure agreement before the meeting when needed
- A reply within 4 business hours
Architecture and cloud examples from practice
Illustrative scenarios showing how migration, cloud foundation, continuity and cost work progresses.
Cloud migration wave
Workloads are not moved all at once but in waves grouped by their dependencies. Each wave's acceptance criteria and rollback plan are written in advance.
Inventory
Physical and virtual servers, applications, the dependencies between them and usage data are mapped.
- 48 virtual servers · 17 applications · 6 databases
- dependency map: 63 connections
Strategy
A path is chosen for each application: rehost, replatform, refactor, retain or retire.
- rehost: 9 · replatform: 4 · refactor: 1
- retain: 2 · retire: 1
Cloud foundation
Before any workload arrives, the account structure, identity, network and security rules are built in code (landing zone).
- $ terraform -chdir=landing-zone apply tfplan
- ✓ Apply complete! Resources: 64 added, 0 changed, 0 destroyed.
Waves and cutover
Each wave is moved with testing, data synchronization and a planned cutover window.
- Wave 2 · 4 applications · Saturday 22:00–02:00
- data sync lag: 2 s
- DNS TTL lowered to 300 s
Acceptance and rollback
If the acceptance criteria are met, the cutover is complete; if not, the documented steps take the service back to the old environment.
- health checks ✓ · response time ✓ · business test ✓
- ✓ Wave 2 completed
Right-sizing
After the migration, resources are resized to match actual usage.
- average CPU 11%
- ✓ 8 virtual machines moved down one size
- Azure Migrate / AWS Application Migration Service
- Terraform
- DNS
Cloud foundation (landing zone)
A landing zone is the foundation made up of account structure, identity, network, security rules, logging and cost tags. Workloads are moved onto this foundation.
Account structure
Separate accounts or subscriptions are created for production, test, shared services and security.
- org/
- ├─ security ├─ shared
- ├─ production └─ test
Identity
Access goes through a central identity provider, with role-based permissions and multi-factor authentication.
- SSO: Entra ID → cloud accounts
- roles: platform-admin · developer · read-only
Network
A hub-spoke network, an IP plan and a secure connection to the corporate network are set up.
- hub 10.0.0.0/16 · production 10.10.0.0/16 · test 10.20.0.0/16
- ✓ site-to-site VPN: connected
Guardrails
Disallowed regions, unencrypted storage and publicly accessible resources are blocked by policy.
- allowed-regions · require-encryption · deny-public-storage
- ✓ 3 policies assigned
Logging and tags
Logs from all accounts are collected in a central account; every resource carries team, project and environment tags.
- audit logs → log-archive account
- ✓ required tags: team, project, environment
- Terraform
- AWS Organizations / Azure Management Groups
- Entra ID
Disaster recovery drill
Backups protect data; high availability keeps the service running when a single component fails; disaster recovery brings the service up elsewhere when an entire environment is lost. The plan is validated through drills.
Targets
For each system, the acceptable downtime (RTO) and data loss (RPO) are agreed with the business units.
- orders-db RTO 4 h · RPO 15 min
- file-server RTO 24 h · RPO 24 h
Backups and copies
Backups are copied to a separate region and to immutable storage.
- transaction log: every 15 min · full backup: daily
- ✓ second-region copy · immutable for 30 days
Drill
In a planned drill, the system is brought up from backup in the second region.
- 12:00 drill started
- 12:41 database restored
- 13:22 application running in second region
Measurement
The actual downtime and data loss are compared with the targets.
- ✓ actual RTO 1 h 22 min (target 4 h)
- ✓ actual RPO 9 min (target 15 min)
Improvement
Steps that did not go smoothly are added to the runbook, and the date of the next drill is set.
- action: automate DNS failover
- next drill: in 6 months
- Backup software
- Second region
- Runbook
Cloud cost review (FinOps)
FinOps makes cloud spending visible so that technical and finance teams can manage it together. The aim is not only to cut costs but to know what the spending delivers.
Visibility
Spending is allocated to teams, projects and environments through tags.
- tagged spend: 62% → 97%
Analysis
Idle, oversized or forgotten resources are listed.
- unattached disks: 23 · stopped servers: 6
- average CPU < 10%: 14 servers
Optimization
Resources are sized to actual usage; test environments are shut down outside business hours.
- test environment: weekdays 08:00–20:00
- ✓ 14 servers moved down one size
Commitments
Reservations or savings plans are evaluated for workloads that run continuously.
- recommendation: 1-year commitment · 70% of baseline usage
Budgets and cadence
Budgets and alerts are defined per team, and a monthly review is put on the calendar.
- budget: production-team-a · thresholds 80% and 100%
- ✓ monthly cost review scheduled
- Tagging
- Cloud cost tool
- Budget alerts